Polluted Water – The Cost of Growth?

Open Letters, Privatisation, Water No Comments »

THE COST OF GROWTH

Recent water pollution problems in Coldstream are but one of the most visible costs society pays for allowing the privatization of our resources, and for allowing more growth than our resources can support.

While the exact problems that caused the most recent water pollution have not yet been admitted, we can safely point to many causes. These causes are well known and have been brought to the attention of all levels of government over the last 20 years or more. During the last 4 years, ordinary people from just about every community east, west, and north of Vernon have urged local government, MoE, as well as Environment Canada to take action. One would hope that water basin boards must have also warned elected officials about upcoming disasters. Read the rest of this entry »

Petropolis: Filming for oil

Biodiversity, Energy, Media Articles, Oil, Water No Comments »

Vanessa Farquharson,
National Post

Film Review: Petropolis (3 stars)

While the debate over Alberta’s tar sands continues to rage, Toronto filmmaker Peter Mettler offers us a silent, 43-minute montage of aerial shots, taken from a helicopter flying over the Athabasca river, which together make one of the most profound statements on this issue to date.

A complete departure from his previous documentary, Gambling, Gods and LSD, Petropolis is at once a quiet meditation on the transformation of serene forest into industrial nightmare and an unabashedly-presented-by-Greenpeace political statement, soaked in a subtext of shame.

http://www.nationalpost.com/arts/story.html?id=2469703

and

http://www.petropolis-film.com

Oilsands industry pollution exceeds official estimates

Climate & Carbon, Denial, Energy, Industrialisation, Oil, Water No Comments »

Contribution by Anne Morris

An independent study recently published in the US-based Proceedings of the National Academy of Science suggests that pollution from Alberta’s oilsands is nearly five times greater than industry figures say and twice as widespread. The study says toxic emissions from the oilsands industry are equal to a major oil spill occurring every year. Government and industry officials say contamination in area soils and rivers is natural, but the study links it firmly to oilsands mining. Read the rest of this entry »

DFO getting tough on derelict docks

Media Articles, Water No Comments »

By Barb Brouwer
Shuswap Market News

Get rid of them, or the government will do it for you.

That is one of the messages the federal Department of Fisheries (DFO) and the province’s Integrated Land Management Bureau (ILMB) want Shuswap and Mara lake waterfront property owners to take very seriously.

Work is underway to remove several old docks from three properties on Shuswap Lake – one at Jewel Bay Resort at the end of Grant Road in Sorrento, where 12 dock structures, some floating, some abandoned on the foreshore and and some sunken are being removed.

ILMB officials are removing the docks because resort owner Ralph Berazan, who was unavailable as of press time, had failed to do so himself.

Clint Zimmerman, ILMB regional compliance and enforcement specialist says the docks at Jewel Bay Resort came to his attention both through complaints made to the Report All Poachers and Polluters (RAPP) line, and foreshore photos gathered by the Columbia Shuswap Regional District last summer as part of the Shuswap Lake Integrated Planning Process (SLIPP).

“It was the impact at Grant Road that fuelled our response. It was fish habitat, the structures pose impediment to public access and there’s lost revenue due to the Crown because they were commercial structures,” says Zimmerman. “We have authority under the land act to take enforcement action to have docks removed.”

He says the owner of Jewel Bay Resort was given written notice to remove the docks and a deadline in which to complete the removal and that ILMB officials began the work when the owner failed to respond.

“Right now we are looking at this is administratively and will be seeking compensation through legal channels,” Zimmerman says, noting residents will either clean up the foreshore themselves or they will pay for the work to be accomplished. “We can also prosecute, and $20,000 and or 60 days imprisonment would be maximum penalty under the land act.”

Zimmerman says it is very important that people clearly understand that the foreshore belongs to the the Crown.

“There are places around that do have title, but it’s rare,” he says. Ninety-five-plus percent of the foreshore is Crown-owned and it’s important for people to understand that once we seize something, it’s government property. So residents who do not comply stand to lose the cost of the structure itself.

In an effort to recoup some of the costs, ILMB will recycle as much of the docks’ wood, metal and rubber components as possible.

Meanwhile, at nearby Henstridge Road, seven structures, mostly large portions of what were once docks are being removed by ILMB officials as will an old dock in Seymour Arm’s Dasniers Bay. That dock extends over a large vegetated area filled with sedges and grasses.

“When not floating it smothers vegetation and becomes a barrier to migrating fish and waves create large scoured areas,” says Michael Crowe, section head of DFO’s Habitat and Enhancement Branch in Kamloops. “It had been there for decades and is used by people, but nobody will take responsibility for it. It doesn’t meet our standards anymore and should be removed.”

From a fisheries perspective, the docks being removed this year are ones that are most harmful to fish and fish habitat, says Crowe, but officials are also aware of, and will be dealing with, other foreshore infractions – added fill, rocks gathered into piles, illegal retaining walls and boat ramps, etc.

Current dock removal projects are being funded by DFO and implemented by ILMB. It is an example of agencies working together as envisioned by SLIPP, the brainchild of Ian McGregor, Fish and Wildlife Science head in the Ministry of Environment’s Kamloops office.

“Ian McGregor has been amazing in finding funding and DFO has offered to pick up the initial cost of this one piece,” Crowe says. “CSRD has gone a long way to changing its role and regulation and with the new official community plans, hopefully there will be bylaws that provide clear rules regarding activities on the foreshore.”

Crowe says officials would like get the word out that government agencies are co-operating and taking steps to change people’s behaviours and understanding of how Shuswap and Mara lakes should be managed.

He says response was positive at public SLIPP meetings and mapping projects when foreshore issues were identified.

“With the frequency number and status of docks, it was generally agreed that they were not appropriate, they were unsustainable and it was agreed they should not be allowed to continue,” he says.

Anyone who has plans to construct a dock, or any other structure on the foreshore should first contact Front Counter B.C. to make sure they have the necessary tenure.

Meanwhile, CSRD planner Marchin Pachinski is also pleased with the inter-agency co-operation imbued in SLIPP.

“There is a better understanding of each agency’s roles, more co-operation and, in turn, more willingness to act,” he says. “I think the (SLIPP and foreshore mapping) projects made us realize the extent of the issues on Shuswap Lake. There’s a greater awareness in the public that the expectation that things will go on as they have in past decades is simply not the case.

Opponents to new mall cheer Salmon Arm environmental review

Local Control, Media Articles, Water No Comments »

Independent expert to determine how often land floods

Josh Dehaas

Globe and Mail

A 400,000-square-foot shopping centre to be built on the edge of the Salmon River is in limbo after the province said it will bring in an independent expert to determine how often the land floods.

A group opposed to the project had earlier commissioned a report that found evidence that the river floods every two to three years, contradicting the original environmental assessment, which showed the river does not top its banks in a typical five-year period. If the land floods more than once every five years, the province is unlikely to allow development because small fish might use the flooded area.

The move surprised the City of Salmon Arm and the developer, SmartCentres, because the Ministry of the Environment had accepted the original environmental assessment in September. The new study should be completed by winter’s end, according to the Environment Ministry. Read the rest of this entry »

BigBoxing in Salmon Arm: Round two

Local Control, Media Articles, Water No Comments »

By Don Sawyer

Round Two: “Selfish A-holes” and “ordinary people”

That was a little over a year ago. To no one’s surprise, Smart!Centres is back. And the fight has gotten even nastier. The developers have replaced their blunt, combative representative with a younger, hipper mouthpiece. While they’ve returned with basically the same proposal except for some cosmetic changes to mitigate the most outrageous of the environmental problems, the packaging is slicker, the sell harder.

http://www.rabble.ca/news/2009/12/bigboxing-salmon-arm-round-two

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in